Affordability Fears Are Driving Retirement Questions Ahead of the Midterms
A new survey of certified financial planners finds clients are squeezed by today's prices and unsure whether Social Security and Medicare will hold up by the time they retire. Here
Ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, the questions landing in financial planners' inboxes are less about market timing and more about arithmetic: whether a paycheck covers the month, and whether the retirement safety net will still be intact decades from now. A recent survey of certified financial planners reported by CNBC found affordability dominating client conversations on both ends of that timeline — near-term costs of living, and long-term doubts about Social Security and Medicare.
The short answer
Two different anxieties are getting blended together. One is a cash-flow problem you can measure today: groceries, rent, insurance premiums, care for aging parents. The other is a policy uncertainty you cannot control: how Congress eventually addresses the funding gaps in Social Security and Medicare. Planners generally treat them separately, because only one of them responds to what you do this month.
Most professional guidance does not assume these programs vanish. It assumes benefits may be less generous than today's schedule promises, and builds in a margin so that a smaller-than-expected check is an inconvenience rather than a crisis.
Why the anxiety is showing up now
Several pressures are stacking at once, which is why the concern spans age groups.
- Prices feel sticky even when inflation cools. A slower rate of increase still sits on top of the higher level already reached. Households experience the level, not the rate.
- Health costs rise on their own schedule. Medicare Part B premiums and out-of-pocket costs have in several recent years climbed faster than the annual Social Security cost-of-living adjustment, which quietly shrinks the net deposit retirees see.
- The trust fund headlines are hard to ignore. Program trustees have projected that Social Security's retirement trust fund reserves are on track for depletion in the 2030s. Depletion is not insolvency — incoming payroll taxes continue — but without legislative changes, those taxes alone would cover only part of scheduled benefits.
- Election-year rhetoric amplifies both. Proposals get discussed loudly and enacted slowly, which raises awareness faster than it raises clarity.
The distinction that matters
Benefit reductions, if they ever come, have historically been phased in with long lead times and have often protected people already receiving or close to receiving benefits. That pattern is not a guarantee. But it does suggest that someone in their 30s and someone in their 60s are facing different versions of the same question, and probably should not react identically.
General information, not advice. This article explains concepts and public projections. It is not individualized financial, tax, or insurance advice. Benefit rules and premium amounts change annually — verify current figures at ssa.gov and medicare.gov, and consider working with a qualified professional on your own situation.
A scenario: stress-testing a smaller benefit
Suppose a hypothetical worker expects a $2,000 monthly Social Security benefit in today's dollars. To see what a haircut would feel like, apply a rough 23% reduction — a figure in the range trustees have described if no legislation passes and payroll taxes alone fund benefits:
- Monthly benefit: $2,000 → about $1,540
- Monthly shortfall: about $460
- Annual shortfall: about $5,520
For a two-earner couple with similar benefits, roughly double it: about $11,000 a year. Using a simple 4% initial withdrawal rate as a planning yardstick, replacing $11,000 of annual income would take somewhere in the neighborhood of $275,000 of additional savings. That is a large number, which is exactly why it's worth knowing before the fact rather than after.
The useful takeaway is not the specific figure. It's the exercise: run your own plan at 100% of scheduled benefits and again at roughly 75%, and see whether the gap is a rounding error or a redesign. If it's a redesign, you have years — possibly decades — of small adjustments available instead of one painful one later.
Practical next steps and alternatives
None of the following requires predicting Congress:
- Pull your actual earnings record. Create or log into a my Social Security account and review your posted earnings and estimated benefits. Errors in the record are correctable, and easier to fix with old documentation still at hand.
- Understand what claiming age does. Claiming earlier than full retirement age permanently reduces the monthly amount; delaying past it increases it up to age 70. This is one of the few large levers most people genuinely control.
- Budget Medicare as a real line item. Part B premiums, Part D, supplemental or Advantage coverage, dental and vision — these rarely total what people assume. Higher-income retirees also face income-related premium surcharges based on a prior tax year.
- Attack the near-term squeeze separately. Refinancing decisions, insurance shopping, and fixed-expense trimming address affordability now and have nothing to do with trust fund projections.
- Build flexibility, not certainty. Diversified savings across account types, a realistic emergency reserve, and skills that extend earning years all improve outcomes across multiple policy futures.
- Check employer and public resources. Many workplace plans include free planning sessions; SHIP counselors offer free, unbiased Medicare help in every state.
Bottom line
The survey's signal is that affordability is now a two-horizon worry: this month's bills and a distant benefit check. Treat them as two projects. The first responds to budgeting and shopping around. The second responds to saving rate, claiming strategy, and a plan that still works if benefits arrive smaller than promised. Neither responds to refreshing election coverage.
FAQ
Will Social Security actually run out of money?
Projections point to trust fund reserve depletion in the 2030s absent legislative action, not to the program ending. Payroll taxes keep flowing in and would continue funding a substantial majority of scheduled benefits. Any change to close the gap would require an act of Congress.
Should I plan as if I'll get nothing?
Most planners consider that overly pessimistic, and it can backfire by pushing people to oversave or delay retirement unnecessarily. Testing a reduced-benefit scenario is common; assuming zero generally is not.
Does this change things if I'm retiring in the next few years?
Past reforms have tended to shield current and near-retirees, though nothing is promised. People close to claiming usually get more mileage from nailing down the decisions in front of them — claiming age, Medicare enrollment deadlines, and withdrawal sequencing — than from forecasting legislation.
Why does my Social Security raise seem to disappear?
Medicare Part B premiums are typically deducted directly from Social Security payments. When premiums rise faster than the cost-of-living adjustment, the net deposit can be flat or nearly so, even though the gross benefit increased.
Tip a story
Spot an error or have a topic you want us to cover? Email editorial@themoneyzone.org. We read everything.
More from Retirement
Why the 2026 Senate Map Runs Straight Through Social Security
Senators elected this November are scheduled to be in office when Social Security's retirement trust fund reserves run out — and new survey data suggests voters in close races are
If You Get Workers' Comp, Your Social Security Disability Check May Be Smaller Than You Think
Federal law caps what you can collect from disability and workers' compensation combined. Here's how the 80% offset works, what a lump-sum settlement can do to it, and why it usual
Retirement Balances Hit Records — But Rising Withdrawals Tell the Other Half of the Story
Fidelity's latest quarterly snapshot shows average 401(k) and IRA balances climbing on market gains, even as more savers pulled cash out. Here's how to read both numbers — and what